W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Material for discussing scoping for version one

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:43:42 +0000
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF219076-44A1-4CCE-A83D-B0941A39D24A@cisco.com>

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 04:56 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
>>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> <WebRTC 1.0 In%2FOut - W3C.pdf>
>>> 
>>> This list might be ok as the start of TODO list of things we still need to
>>> resolve but the idea that default decision is "Ignore unknown mandatory
>>> constraints" is something that we could decide if we we do it now or later
>>> makes no sense. That is something we need to decide before we get the 1.0
>>> spec out.
>> 
>> Agreed. If you look carefully in the "proposed decision" column, that
>> particular row has "no" as the proposed decision.
>> 
>> In general, the proposed decisions are "Yes" (do it before LC), "Not in 1.0"
>> (we may or may not do it later) and "No" (we won't do it, and recommend that
>> the question not be revisited either).
> 
> Are the contents of this column actually the chair's proposal for what
> we should do? Just a placeholder? I worked on this document, but
> they're certainly don't match my opinion.

I've never seen this list before and very curios who was working on it but either way,  same as EKR I don't understand. Is this the chairs proposal on what we should do ? Or is this what they chairs claim there is consensus to do?  Would you add the items I sent to the agenda call as things to discuss? 



 
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 19:44:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC