- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:43:42 +0000
- To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> On 12/16/2013 04:56 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK >>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >>> >>>> <WebRTC 1.0 In%2FOut - W3C.pdf> >>> >>> This list might be ok as the start of TODO list of things we still need to >>> resolve but the idea that default decision is "Ignore unknown mandatory >>> constraints" is something that we could decide if we we do it now or later >>> makes no sense. That is something we need to decide before we get the 1.0 >>> spec out. >> >> Agreed. If you look carefully in the "proposed decision" column, that >> particular row has "no" as the proposed decision. >> >> In general, the proposed decisions are "Yes" (do it before LC), "Not in 1.0" >> (we may or may not do it later) and "No" (we won't do it, and recommend that >> the question not be revisited either). > > Are the contents of this column actually the chair's proposal for what > we should do? Just a placeholder? I worked on this document, but > they're certainly don't match my opinion. I've never seen this list before and very curios who was working on it but either way, same as EKR I don't understand. Is this the chairs proposal on what we should do ? Or is this what they chairs claim there is consensus to do? Would you add the items I sent to the agenda call as things to discuss?
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 19:44:12 UTC