- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:06:20 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > On 12/16/2013 08:36 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> Hmm... I feel like this is a little fixated on timeline. I would rather >> ask what's needed to have something that's viable. > > > It seems that people think what's implemented now is "viable" for a lot of > applications (even thouhgh many find it painful to use). That's not the impression I receive talking to people at shows. Rather, they think it's demoable and urgently needs a bunch of stuff. > So any new features have to be justified as to why they make the platform > more viable. Well, I certainly don't agree that that's the default, so perhaps we should discuss that question first. -Ekr
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2013 16:07:28 UTC