W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Material for discussing scoping for version one

From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:02:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPXcqH6M8F6BDwOatqb3vBST76WSApQaTDdtVTRSspEhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> On 12/16/2013 04:56 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
>> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>> <WebRTC 1.0 In%2FOut - W3C.pdf>
>>
>> This list might be ok as the start of TODO list of things we still need to
>> resolve but the idea that default decision is "Ignore unknown mandatory
>> constraints" is something that we could decide if we we do it now or later
>> makes no sense. That is something we need to decide before we get the 1.0
>> spec out.
>
> Agreed. If you look carefully in the "proposed decision" column, that
> particular row has "no" as the proposed decision.
>
> In general, the proposed decisions are "Yes" (do it before LC), "Not in 1.0"
> (we may or may not do it later) and "No" (we won't do it, and recommend that
> the question not be revisited either).

Are the contents of this column actually the chair's proposal for what
we should do? Just a placeholder? I worked on this document, but
they're certainly don't match my opinion.


>> Given most these things will need many minutes of discussion to even
>> understand what they are, and that we one hour total, how do you plan to run
>> the meeting? Let me make this much cripser, as chair, can you sort out a
>> list of items you think are the right ones to consider for removal in the
>> 1.0 spec?
>
>
> We start out with this list. Then we remove things from it.

I'm not really following this.

-Ekr
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 18:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:37 UTC