- From: Hutton, Andrew <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:59:36 +0000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
As Stefan stated below a knob on the PeerConnection constructor to not bundle would also do the job. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Håkansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] > Sent: 22 August 2013 13:45 > To: Harald Alvestrand > Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Transport related API need > > On 2013-08-22 07:31, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > > On 08/20/2013 06:46 PM, Hutton, Andrew wrote: > ... > >> > >> It should I know be possible for the receiver of the offer to > >> ignore the bundle option and everything to work but I believe there > >> should be a clean API that can be used to tell the browser not to > >> even attempt bundling without relying on the application to modify > >> SDP. > > > > I'm not convinced that the case exists in the real world where > > offering bundling is harmful. > > To me the obvious use case would be for a browser to browser session > where the app knows that separate transports would be beneficial > (perhaps the access network can apply different treatment based on 5- > tuple). > > In this case both end-points support Bundle, and it would be used > unless > the app can ask for it not to be used. > > However, I guess you can get the same result by sending the different > tracks over different PeerConnections (given that they would use the > same CNAME so they can be synchronized at playout). > > > > > If we need it, I agree that it should be possible to just twist an > > API knob. I'm just not finding the need compelling. > > To it seems that the knob (if we conclude there should be such a knob) > should be placed on the PeerConnection constructor - when creating a PC > you can ask it to not use Bundle. > > > > > (This is an useful case to consider; I think that if we call this > > one way or the other, it will make precedent for other items where > > SDP negotiation *should* result in things working OK, but people > > still want to do SDP mangling of an offer). > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 13:00:03 UTC