On 2013-04-25 06:36, Justin Uberti wrote: > In the Lyon discussion, we specifically agreed to use > onicecandidate(null) rather than invent a new callback for the > icegatheringstate change, as it was felt that such a callback would be > redundant, and would also not meet all the needs of the trickle-ice > proposal. Yes, that was our decision at the time. I'm just forwarding feedback from developers who think it's a bit strange and unintuitive. Especially with regards to the name of the event and how similar things work in other APIs. How would a separate "gathering done"-event not meet all the needs of the trickle-ice proposal? /AdamReceived on Thursday, 25 April 2013 08:24:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:42 UTC