W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > April 2013

Re: icecandidate event with no candidate

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:23:49 +0200
Message-ID: <5178E815.90100@ericsson.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
CC: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2013-04-25 06:36, Justin Uberti wrote:
> In the Lyon discussion, we specifically agreed to use
> onicecandidate(null) rather than invent a new callback for the
> icegatheringstate change, as it was felt that such a callback would be
> redundant, and would also not meet all the needs of the trickle-ice
> proposal.

Yes, that was our decision at the time. I'm just forwarding feedback 
from developers who think it's a bit strange and unintuitive. Especially 
with regards to the name of the event and how similar things work in 
other APIs.

How would a separate "gathering done"-event not meet all the needs of 
the trickle-ice proposal?

Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 08:24:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:42 UTC