- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:23:49 +0200
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2013-04-25 06:36, Justin Uberti wrote: > In the Lyon discussion, we specifically agreed to use > onicecandidate(null) rather than invent a new callback for the > icegatheringstate change, as it was felt that such a callback would be > redundant, and would also not meet all the needs of the trickle-ice > proposal. Yes, that was our decision at the time. I'm just forwarding feedback from developers who think it's a bit strange and unintuitive. Especially with regards to the name of the event and how similar things work in other APIs. How would a separate "gathering done"-event not meet all the needs of the trickle-ice proposal? /Adam
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 08:24:14 UTC