Re: DataChannels API

On 9/6/2012 10:09 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:
>
> Right now I've implemented 1a (which is simple).  My preference is 
> probably for 2a, though 2b is simpler and we could (via the IETF) 
> switch to 2b later if we want. 

I meant "we could (via the IETF) switch to 2a later if we want" (I.e. if 
we initially do 2b).  They're the same from the JS API level.

-- 
Randell Jesup
randell-ietf@jesup.org

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 14:18:59 UTC