Re: DataChannels API

On 9/6/2012 10:09 AM, Randell Jesup wrote:
> Right now I've implemented 1a (which is simple).  My preference is 
> probably for 2a, though 2b is simpler and we could (via the IETF) 
> switch to 2b later if we want. 

I meant "we could (via the IETF) switch to 2a later if we want" (I.e. if 
we initially do 2b).  They're the same from the JS API level.

Randell Jesup

Received on Thursday, 6 September 2012 14:18:59 UTC