On 9/1/2012 5:19 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > Randell Jesup wrote: >> Is the single "reliable" attribute enough? Do we need to expose the > > I would think we would want a separate "ordered" attribute as well. > Guaranteed/non-duplicated delivery and ordered delivery are orthogonal > concepts in SCTP, and I don't see why we wouldn't want to expose that. Agreed. I don't see a ton of downside to exposing it, though if we wanted to expose all the parameters as a copy of the input dictionary object that's more work, as opposed to exposing some normal readonly attributes. In theory they could be settable, but that would complexify the protocol with little gain, since you can just open a new channel and close the old one. So: expose ordered. Open question: expose values for rexmit num and time? -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.orgReceived on Sunday, 2 September 2012 02:19:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:33 UTC