- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:06:37 +0200
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 10/17/2012 01:55 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 15:40, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:18 , Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I would like to see some time spent on the plan for addressing the
>>> open SDP issue.
>> Could say exactly what the open issue is?
> Specifically:
> [...] We also recognize that the exact use of
> SDP and SDP features is currently underspecified, making it difficult to
> build interoperating UA implementations, and, for the interop to legacy
> cases, difficult to write applications that modify the SDPs to enable
> interop. This is something that must be sorted out, the main
> responsibility for this lies with the IETF rtcweb WG.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Sep/0098.html
>
Since this meeting is of the WEBRTC WG, I think the main thing we want
to say is what functions we want the SDP negotiation to accomplish, and
how we think SDP requirements for negotiation get reflected at the API
level.
The fact that we've got a large overlap of participation with RTCWEB
means that we should at least be able to have an informed discussion of
this topic, but the actual SDP syntax and semantics issues need to be
dealt with in the IETF, I think.
Harald
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 10:07:11 UTC