Makes sense to me. -- dan On Oct 4, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Hi, > > I think we decided some time ago that in order to limit our impact on the namespace, we'd prefix our interfaces and data types with "RTC". > > It seems that we've mostly done this, but not fully; the following interfaces are not prefixed: > > - DataChannel interface > - MediaStreamEvent > - DataChannelEvent > - DataChannelState enum > - DataChannelInit dictionary > - DataChannelEventInit dictionary > - MediaStreamEventInit dictionary > > I may have missed some. > For the MediaStream stuff, we can argue that this is from another spec that we're not changing (using the MediaStream prefix), but the DataChannel is purely a WebRTC construct. > > Is there any objection to just adding the prefix? > > Harald > >Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 08:06:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:34 UTC