- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:17:54 +0000
- To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 5 November 2012 10:41, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote: > In the network case, a media description is used to create the stream and > the receiving side and it's pretty capable of describing future stream > content. In our local case, the user may only grant one media component. > Perhaps ended track state is good enough to solve this. It might be possible to combine those two things into an onready event. For user streams this would indicate consent, for network streams, the first packet. Something to consider. > I think we'll freak people out if a tainted stream is delivered at once. Yeah, that and the impact that it will have on page authors, who are then more likely to make the mistake EKR was concerned about.
Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 12:18:25 UTC