- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 07:54:53 +0200
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FA0CC2D.1060103@alvestrand.no>
Given that part of this debate has been across both groups, please take note of the note below that the chairs posted to the public-media-capture list. Since the constraints interface is going to apply first to GetUserMedia, we'd like to keep the debate there, as long as we have to pick one list. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Direction: Constraints Resent-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 11:33:24 +0000 Resent-From: public-media-capture@w3.org Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 13:32:54 +0200 From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> To: public-media-capture@w3.org <public-media-capture@w3.org> Given the debates we've had about the constraints/capabilities functionality, the clear need many see for it, and the proposal that Dan Burnett posted to the mailing list on April 23 and the debate that has followed it, the Chairs declare that we have a reasonable consensus that moving forward with this specification is the right thing to do. The chairs are therefore asking the editors to incorporate this proposal in the current documents. Of course, suggestions for improvements to this API are always welcome. Harald and Stefan, speaking as chairs
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 05:55:24 UTC