- From: Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:13:42 +0000
- To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi, Would it be fair to say that a key difference between these two proposals is who controls the signaling state machine: PeerConnection or the application? Thanks. Li -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] 发送时间: 2012年3月21日 0:15 收件人: public-webrtc@w3.org 主题: JSEP API changes - choosing a path forward List, we now have two member contributions suggesting changes to the PeerConnection API in order to align with the JSEP direction suggested in the IETF: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0049.html (from Adam) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Mar/0064.html (from Cullen) In order to make quick progress, the chairs aim to call for the incorporation of one of these in the core document as soon as consensus is detected in the WG; if it's not obvious before what the consensus is, the chairs aim to make a call one way or the other based on the list traffic up to ca March 30 (this is just after the IETF meeting, so people taking the opportunity for face-to-face discussion can report on those discussions here). All list members who have reviewed both documents are encouraged to state their opinion on the list. Harald and Stefan
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 06:15:42 UTC