- From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:54:28 -0400
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 6/15/2012 5:33 PM, Justin Uberti wrote: > Reviewing the latest draft, the meanings of some of the values of > PeerState and IceState were unclear. In addition, there was no IceState > to indicate a liveness check failure. > > The following is a proposal to provide clear state information from both > PeerState and IceState as well as to notify the application of liveness > check failures. > > If you can't see the state diagrams below, you can view them at > https://docs.google.com/document/d/13TYiNSEmFkB7IeNLEJFxI0xMNk8q_LhXE_hbvFbXRTU/edit#. This all seems reasonable to me. -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 18:55:28 UTC