- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:45:43 +0200
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 06/19/2012 10:11 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 14:21 -0400, Justin Uberti a écrit : > >> Therefore, I suggest the following declaration of IceCandidate. I >> think it is useful for this to be an object as opposed to a >> dictionary, since in the future we could add accessors to get at all >> the various candidate fields (component, foundation, etc). > If this is something we may need in the future (but don't have clear use > cases for now), can't we just go with a dictionary now, and make it an > object if and when we need it? > > Using a dedicated interface will require developers to use a constructor > when a simple JavaScript object would do, without any concrete benefit. > not using a dedicated interface now will mean that we have to support simple JavaScript objects forever, I assume.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 08:46:14 UTC