- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:11:21 +0200
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 14:21 -0400, Justin Uberti a écrit : > Therefore, I suggest the following declaration of IceCandidate. I > think it is useful for this to be an object as opposed to a > dictionary, since in the future we could add accessors to get at all > the various candidate fields (component, foundation, etc). If this is something we may need in the future (but don't have clear use cases for now), can't we just go with a dictionary now, and make it an object if and when we need it? Using a dedicated interface will require developers to use a constructor when a simple JavaScript object would do, without any concrete benefit. Dom
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 08:19:05 UTC