- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:07:56 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2012-06-15 08:52, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 06/14/2012 04:54 PM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >> >>>> >>>> 3. Come up with a new shorter name that less general and keep the >>>> objects in the global namespace. >>>> * PeerSessionDescription >>>> * PeerMediaDescription >>>> - SessionDescription doesn't mean that much to the average web >>>> developer so we could go with Media instead to make the usage >>>> clearer. >>> Neither 1 nor 3 move them out of the global namespace. >> >> I don't see moving them out of the global namespace as the only >> solution to this problem (even though that's how the action was >> formulated). We're already putting a lot of stuff in the global >> namespace with PeerConnection prefixes. Renaming was also discussed >> during the meeting. > > There's a reason why the action was recorded at it was; I thought that > once it was pointed out that we could reduce our pollution footprint, it > was obvious that we should do so. Sure, but IceCandidate and SessionDescription are only two of the names we introduce in the global namespace (others are DataChannel, PeerConnectionErrorCallback, ...). I think we need to be consistent or determine that some objects are special enough to be treated differently. I simply wanted to present our alternatives and get some comments from the people who had opinions about this on the meeting. /Adam > Background: > > The global namespace is a horrible misfeature of Javascript. > > To quote "Javascript: The Good Parts": > " JavaScript’s global object [...] is far and away the worst part of > JavaScript’s many bad parts" > (appendix E, quoted on > http://oreilly.com/javascript/excerpts/javascript-good-parts/json.html) > > (quick check: Did you know that anything defined to be in browser > Javascript's global namespace is defined as a property on "Window"? Do > you know when it is not?) > > Not polluting it is good for both our API and the sanity of the world. > > Harald >
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 10:08:27 UTC