- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:24:10 +0200
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Le jeudi 14 juin 2012 à 11:19 -0400, Justin Uberti a écrit : > IceCandidate and SessionDescription represent different concepts. For > example, IceCandidate has a label attribute to indicate which media it > is relevant for (it's not just a DOMString). That might be the intent, but not what the current spec has; if there is a need for two strings, I suggest a dictionary rather than a full blown interface. > And SessionDescription will surely have methods in the future to make > handling SDP less messy. That's the part that I think was at least somewhat controversial during the F2F. > Combining them to save a namespace name seems like the wrong > optimization. In this case, it's not so much about namespacing the interfaces as much as determining whether they're useful at all. Dom
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 15:24:33 UTC