Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com> wrote:
>> I agree, a way to not use any STUN or TURN server should be specified.
>
>
>
> You should be able to just not provide servers.
>
>
>
> I think we need to distinguish two cases even without any STUN/TURN server:
> 1) do ICE without it; 2) don’t do ICE at all.
>
>
>
> In case 1), I think the ICE agent will still perform host candidate
> gathering and checking (STUN Bind Request/Response) even without other types
> of candidates found from the servers.
>
> In case 2), the ICE agent is disabled and no ICE messages are exchanged
> between peers before RTP – which could be useful if the peer doesn’t support
> ICE.

The WG has already decided that ICE is required. See
draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch

-Ekr

>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Li
>
>