- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:43:06 -0700
- To: Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com> wrote: >> I agree, a way to not use any STUN or TURN server should be specified. > > > > You should be able to just not provide servers. > > > > I think we need to distinguish two cases even without any STUN/TURN server: > 1) do ICE without it; 2) don’t do ICE at all. > > > > In case 1), I think the ICE agent will still perform host candidate > gathering and checking (STUN Bind Request/Response) even without other types > of candidates found from the servers. > > In case 2), the ICE agent is disabled and no ICE messages are exchanged > between peers before RTP – which could be useful if the peer doesn’t support > ICE. The WG has already decided that ICE is required. See draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch -Ekr > > > Thanks. > > Li > >
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 16:44:14 UTC