W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Feedback on the PeerConnection API

From: Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:36:45 +0000
To: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B60F8F444AAC9C49A9EF0D12D05E0942216AF30E@szxeml535-mbx.china.huawei.com>
> I agree, a way to not use any STUN or TURN server should be specified.

You should be able to just not provide servers.

I think we need to distinguish two cases even without any STUN/TURN server: 1) do ICE without it; 2) don't do ICE at all.

In case 1), I think the ICE agent will still perform host candidate gathering and checking (STUN Bind Request/Response) even without other types of candidates found from the servers.
In case 2), the ICE agent is disabled and no ICE messages are exchanged between peers before RTP - which could be useful if the peer doesn't support ICE.

Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 16:37:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:30 UTC