Re: [rtcweb] Joint JSEP draft posted

Thanks for your questions. As they came in as I was preparing -02 for
publication, I did not try to resolve them in -02.

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> **
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I sent out some questions on jsep-01, and I do believe they
> apply also to -02.
>
> JSEP-01: SDP_PRANSWER and FEDEX use-case
> JSEP-01: Associating ICE candidates with m- lines
> JSEP-01: Release of non-needed ICE candidates
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Justin Uberti
> *Sent:* 16. helmikuuta 2012 7:54
> *To:* public-webrtc@w3.org; rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Cc:* Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> *Subject:* [rtcweb] Joint JSEP draft posted
>
> I've just uploaded a -02 version of the JSEP draft, to which Cullen
> Jennings has agreed to sign on as a co-author. This draft includes a few
> specific changes suggested by Cullen to ensure that JSEP can be used to
> create applications that are RFC 3264-compliant, if desired.
>
> The draft is available at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uberti-rtcweb-jsep-02. Please refer to
> this latest version of the document when responding to the JSEP call for
> consensus.
>
> Best regards,
> --justin
>
>