- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:47:09 +0100
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 12/12/2012 11:18 AM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: > On 12/11/2012 04:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> Enclosed is my stats v2 proposal, as it stands today. >> Things to note: >> >> - Using the dictionary *grammar* to describe objects, without making >> dictionary *objects* (since that's impossible to implement due to some >> WebKit limitations). >> - Using an unique "id" to point between different objects inside the >> stats DB. >> - Focusing on the objects that need defining, expecting to fill in the >> stats references later. >> >> I think this looks cleaner. It's obvious (to me, at least) where to add >> the stats that aren't included yet. >> It's only 6 pages, including the introduction and a code example. > > I think it would be cleaner if we did the object orientation thing we > did for DTMF for stats as well. So, instead of doing > > pc.getStats(selector, callbakcfunction); > > you'd do > > var statsReporter = pc.createStatsObject(selector); > > and then using the statsReporter object to obtain stats. Are you thinking of a new statsreporter object whenever one wants stats (so that the statsreporter provides access to a snapshot), or a statsreporter object that has only a getStats method? In the latter case, I don't see enough justificiation for the extra object, but this is a matter of taste. > > > >> >> Comments welcome - more on Thursday! >> >> Harald >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 10:47:38 UTC