Re: Call for proposals on agenda items

I have been wokring on a proposal here and expect to have something
soonish.

-Ekr


On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if this WG is responsible for the item 3 below [1] as I didn't remember seeing any discussions about it:
>
>
> 5.6.3. Items for Standardization
>
>
>    In order to make this work, we must standardize the following items:
>
>    o  The precise information from the signaling message that must be
>       cryptographically bound to the user's identity and a mechanism for
>       carrying assertions in JSEP messages.  Section 5.6.4
>    o  The interface to the IdP.  Section 5.6.5 specifies a specific
>       protocol mechanism which allows the use of any identity protocol
>       without requiring specific further protocol support in the browser
>    o  The JavaScript interfaces which the calling application can use to
>       specify the IdP to use to generate assertions and to discover what
>       assertions were received.
>
>    The first two items are defined in this document.  The final one is
>    defined in the companion W3C WebRTC API specification [TODO:REF]
>
> Thanks.
> Li
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-03
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:31 AM
> To: public-webrtc@w3.org
> Subject: Call for proposals on agenda items
>
> All,
>
> as we're planning for a new Telco, the chairs would like proposals on
> what we should discuss at the meeting. An obvious candidate is the new
> API proposal recently submitted, but what else should we cover?
>
> Stefan for the chairs
>
>

Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 16:23:00 UTC