- From: Li Li <Li.NJ.Li@huawei.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:13:37 +0000
- To: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Hi,
I wonder if this WG is responsible for the item 3 below [1] as I didn't remember seeing any discussions about it:
5.6.3. Items for Standardization
In order to make this work, we must standardize the following items:
o The precise information from the signaling message that must be
cryptographically bound to the user's identity and a mechanism for
carrying assertions in JSEP messages. Section 5.6.4
o The interface to the IdP. Section 5.6.5 specifies a specific
protocol mechanism which allows the use of any identity protocol
without requiring specific further protocol support in the browser
o The JavaScript interfaces which the calling application can use to
specify the IdP to use to generate assertions and to discover what
assertions were received.
The first two items are defined in this document. The final one is
defined in the companion W3C WebRTC API specification [TODO:REF]
Thanks.
Li
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-03
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Hakansson LK [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:31 AM
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Call for proposals on agenda items
All,
as we're planning for a new Telco, the chairs would like proposals on
what we should discuss at the meeting. An obvious candidate is the new
API proposal recently submitted, but what else should we cover?
Stefan for the chairs
Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 16:14:25 UTC