W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Agenda proposal TPAC

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:55:06 -0600
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <797F8AD4-E8DB-41D5-B664-29EC23E926B6@cisco.com>
To: Stefan Håkansson <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>

Looks good but my experience with standards meeting is we should plan to go to 17:30 on Nov 1 and we get done early that is great. 

On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:42 AM, Stefan Håkansson wrote:

> Dear WG,
> 
> a proposed agenda for the F2F Oct 31-Nov 1. Feedback is very appreciated.
> 
> The assumed times are:
> October 31, 0900-1230 (3.5 hours) & 1330-1730 (4 hours)
> November 1, 0900-1230 (3.5 hours) & 1330-TBD
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monday Oct 31:
> ==============
> * Review/feedback on IETF docs and on IETF reqs posed to W3C 2 hours
> ** Overview/Architecture 45 min
> ** Use cases and requirements 45 min
> ** Security reqs 30 min
> 
> * Discuss access control model and privacy/security aspects 1 hour
> ** Permitting access to camera / microphone
> ** Short-term vs long term permissions
> ** Permissions and the user model
> ** Showing that camera / microphone is in use
> ** Revoking permission
> 
> * Proposals for access to low level functions 1/2 hour
> ** Interaction between low level functions and high level functions
> 
> Lunch
> 
> * Go through the API proposal in detail. Record outstanding issues and
> problems.
> ** MediaStream 2 hours
> *** Definition of Track and Stream
> *** Immutable Stream.TrackList
> *** getUserMedia
> *** Recording
> *** Cloning
> *** Assembling tracks to a new MediaStream
> ** Data streams (whatever we have at that stage) 0-30 min
> ** PeerConnection 2 hours
> *** (including SDP o/a)
> *** Events
> *** States
> *** ....
> 
> Tuesday Nov 1:
> ==============
> 
> * Re-iterate the main findings of the Monday API session 30 min
> ** (with fresh brains, and having had time for reflection)
> 
> * Implementation status 2 hours
> **Implementors tell what functions they have implemented so far, and
> issues met
> 
> * Revisit use cases to see how they can be met with the API
> ** Pseudocode
> ** Matching against implemented subset
> ** (Possibly some “live” testing)
> 
> * Joint session with the Audio WG 1 hour
> ** Reviewing the Audio API situation
> ** Identifying Audio requirements from use cases and seeing if they are
> covered
> 
> Lunch
> 
> * Matters arising, Any Other Business (flexible)
> * Summing up 45 min
> ** Actions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Stefan for the chairs
> 
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 14:55:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 15:19:25 UTC