W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > October 2011

Re: CHANGE: Use a JS Object as an argument to getUserMedia

From: ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ <tommyw@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 08:59:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CALLKCfNPLAzQOq+BcDaQ4kHuLWEkPZi3aLgGZWop8y-oRY=fGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
Yeah, I understood that during the office hour call. Dunno, your suggestion
seems less elegant and clear but that might just be because I am quite new
to the JS world. Can you list some use cases where your suggestion will
really make a difference?


On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 19:45, Anant Narayanan <anant@mozilla.com> wrote:

> On Oct 4, 2011, at 12:33 AM, Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ) wrote:
> > Whereas I have nothing against changing the configuration string to a JS
> object, I don't like the conversion from asynchronous result to a
> synchronous one. Opening a webcam can take many seconds, which means that
> the JS world is stuck during that interval.
> The proposal doesn't suggest that the operation is asynchronous, you do
> have to attach an event listener or a callback on the MediaStream that is
> returned. It behaves exactly like XHR in this regard.
> Cheers,
> -Anant

Tommy Widenflycht, Senior Software Engineer
Google Sweden AB, Kungsbron 2, SE-11122 Stockholm, Sweden
Org. nr. 556656-6880
And yes, I have to include the above in every outgoing email according to EU
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 06:59:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:17:22 UTC