- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:57:27 +0100
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 11/10/2011 06:34 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I've been thinking about this a bunch and I'm happy to volunteer, as > long as you're > OK with it being someone who's not a WG member. Thank you! Mahalingam Mani already organized a workshop on this at TPAC on Wednesday (that day was done "unconference" styile), and has volunteered to take the lead as a WG member. I'm sure you can work on this together. > -Ekr > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Harald Alvestrand<harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >> In the minutes from TPAC, there was a long section on identity: If you want >> to verify who you're talking to, what namespace are you actually verifying >> the identity against, and how is that mapped onto observable fields in >> protocols, and from there to stuff that's visible on the API? >> >> A lot of the discussion is here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/11/01-webrtc-minutes.html#item06 >> >> I'd very much welcome if someone could pick up this action and present some >> actionable proposals for it: >> >> - How do we verify identity without tying ourselves to one specific identity >> framework? >> - What functions in our channel setup mechanism (DTLS-SRTP hashes???) do we >> use for communicating info that lets us verify the identity? >> - What are the requirements for the UI that result from such a verification >> mechanism? >> >> Volunteers? >> >> Harald, for the chairs >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 09:57:59 UTC