Doodle poll (Re: Welcome to the WG, and getting started)

Here's a link to a Doodle poll for our initial meeting:

Times are picked to be not-completely-horrible for Europe/CET and US/PT; 

On 05/12/11 12:39, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> All,
> so we're finally a formal W3C WG!
> To get things started, there are a number of things to discuss and
> agree on , e.g.:
> * What studies and documents should the WG initiate?
> * Who are our volunteers to start editing documents?
> * What starting point should be selected for API draft(s)?
> * How should cooperation with WhatWG and the IETF RTCWeb WG be organized?
> * How should the operations of the WG be organized?
> We think that a teleconference could be a good way to get things
> started, and for people to get to know each others' voices, and we
> plan to organize one in the near future. If you agree to that this is
> a good idea, we will initiate a doodle poll for the time of the first
> teleconference shortly.
> When it comes to f2f meetings, two obvious possibilities are to
> organize a meeting in conjunction with the Quebec IETF meeting (July
> 24-29) and one during the TPAC week (Oct 31 - Nov 4; S:a Clara CA).
> So far, ten persons from eight organizations (one being W3C itself)
> have formally joined the working group. Given how broad and complex
> the task of the WG is we think there should be more members, but we're
> told that there are many more people subscribing to the public email
> list, and we expect that more organizations will join formally
> shortly.
> Francois, Harald and Stefan

Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 03:27:15 UTC