- From: Göran Eriksson AP <goran.ap.eriksson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:39:37 +0200
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2011-07-19 13.20, "Harald Alvestrand" <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >On 07/18/11 23:07, Ian Hickson wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Prakash wrote: >>> Excellent. Thanks Ian. I was most concerned about interop with non >>> browser/existing systems. If the message is not opaque, then anyone >>> should be able to translate it if needed. >> Indeed. Compatibility with SIP in particular was high on my mind when >> designing this API; the intent is that it should be almost trivial to >>do a >> SIP gateway for this stuff. (I mean, as trivial as this stuff can get, >> anyway...) >> >FWIW, this is one area where Ian and I still don't agree; I think SDP is >a representation format we need to avoid, and that we're better off with >a JSON-based format where the relevant information can be easily >transformed into SDP when needed. Just to make sure I understand- it is only the format You dislike, not the semantics and/or the procedures as such of SDP? > >This is what the current Google WebRTC implementation supports. > >We fully agree that the format needs to be >a) documented >b) possible to map into SDP for gatewaying purposes > > Harald > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 10:40:03 UTC