- From: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:18:05 -0500
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 12/20/2011 10:48 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 12/20/2011 11:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> In general, experience shows that people usually forgo the named >> constant and just use the numbers instead, which is the worst outcome >> possible, as it makes the code very difficult to read and understand. >> Since using strings instead has no real downsides, and avoids all of >> the downsides of numeric constants, they are now the preferred way to >> handle this sort of thing. > I see the logic. The lack of enums in the language hurts again. > I still miss the ability to document (for programmers) in WebIDL what > the permitted values are; is there a comment convention for doing that > at the moment? What about IDL dictionaries? -- Randell Jesup randell-ietf@jesup.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 15:20:51 UTC