- From: Elwell, John <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:50:53 +0200
- To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Randell, Good point - if the first RTCP packet gets dropped, it will be a long time before the next one arrives, and in the meantime no CSRC to SSRC mapping will be available. John John Elwell Tel: +44 1908 817801 (office and mobile) Email: john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com http://www.siemens-enterprise.com/uk/ Siemens Enterprise Communications Limited. Registered office: Brickhill Street, Willen Lake, Milton Keynes, MK15 0DJ. Registered No: 5903714, England. Siemens Enterprise Communications Limited is a Trademark Licensee of Siemens AG. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webrtc-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-webrtc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Randell Jesup > Sent: 24 August 2011 21:13 > To: public-webrtc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Mapping of media streams to RTP (Re: Query: What > does "context" mean in the context (sic) of requirement A15? > [ACTION-6]) > > On 8/24/2011 11:47 AM, Elwell, John wrote: > >> RTCP doesn't have a delay if a SR is the first thing sent on > >> a session, > >> as recommended in draft-perkins-avt-rapid-rtp-sync-03 > section 2.1.1 - > >> this is permitted by RFC 3550 too, it notes. > > [JRE] OK, so CNAME can be used to map an RTP stream to a > given media description in SDP. CNAME alone does not indicate > the purpose of an RTP stream - it would still need something > else to map it to "game" or "agent", and that is where > a=content comes in. > > Don't count on RTCP getting received... Start of a session > might even > be the worst place for it. > > -- > Randell Jesup > randell-ietf@jesup.org > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 07:51:34 UTC