public-webrtc-logs@w3.org from February 2026 by author

Alexandra Borovova via GitHub

• [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Add algorithm for browser automation. (Friday, 6 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95) (Friday, 13 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95) (Friday, 13 February)

François Daoust via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296) (Monday, 9 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296) (Monday, 9 February)

guidou via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add algorithm for browser automation. (#328) (Thursday, 12 February)

Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub

• [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by jan-ivar (Thursday, 5 February)

Peter Thatcher via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Per-packet notifications are mandatory, this is not ideal for context switching (#78) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Per-packet notifications are mandatory, this is not ideal for context switching (#78) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does RTCRtpTranport(Processor) work with RTCRtpSendStream/RTCRtpReceiveStream? (#71) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should RTCRtpTransport(Processor) use event handlers for packet notifications? (#70) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] No signal when transport path change. (#57) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom BWE without pacing is not well supported. (#56) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom BWE without pacing is not well supported. (#56) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Add stats on queued event drops when apps aren't keeping up with reading (#55) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Controls of internal queue lengths (#54) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Controls of internal queue lengths (#54) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] There are two `readPacketizedRtp` functions. (#49) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] RtpTransport and transport re-direction (#48) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet forwarding is not supported (#40) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet prioritization is not supported. (#38) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet prioritization is not supported. (#38) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should `RtpSendStream` and `RtpReceiveStream` be removed? (#47) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Should RtpSendStream/RtpReceiveStream be transferable? (#36) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] RtpSendStreamInit and RtpReceiveStreamInit are not defined in explainer-use-case-1.md (#35) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Only allow RtpTransport (max-bundle) (#34) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Make RtpTransportProcessor transferable (#33) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How do the two `sendRtp` functions interact? (#32) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Custom extensions not supported (#29) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Clarify RTCP use of Use Case 1 (#27) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Clarify RTCP use of Use Case 1 (#27) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Not requiring per-packet JS Events (#20) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Not requiring per-packet JS Events (#20) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Examples pipe multiple streams into a single writable (#15) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Examples pipe multiple streams into a single writable (#15) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Update examples to use standard APIs (#14) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Workers (#13) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Arbitrary RTP Header Extensions (#12) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Arbitrary RTCP messages (#11) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] SDP "Bumper lanes" (#10) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] SDP "Bumper lanes" (#10) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Support L4S RFC8888 (#82) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Packet sender needs to expose a signal about max packet size (#83) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Add control over the feedback interval for Custom Congestion Control Use Case (#85) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Send/Receive PLI/FIR (#86) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Send/Receive PLI/FIR (#86) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Expose L4S bits on the receiver side (#87) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Customizing piecemeal (#9) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] Customizing piecemeal (#9) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] WHATWG Streams support? (#8) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] WHATWG Streams support? (#8) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does cryptex work? (#7) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Closed: [webrtc-rtptransport] How does cryptex work? (#7) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] new commits pushed by pthatcher (Tuesday, 10 February)

Philipel-WebRTC via GitHub

• [webrtc-rtptransport] Make Philipel-WebRTC "admin" of the webrtc-rtptransport repo. (#95) (Friday, 13 February)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] RTP/SRTP support? (#94) (Friday, 13 February)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] Do we need an ICE restart function? (#93) (Friday, 13 February)

Philipp Hancke via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47) (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47) (Tuesday, 10 February)

Sergio Garcia Murillo via GitHub

• Re: [webrtc-rtptransport] Do we need an ICE restart function? (#93) (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47) (Wednesday, 11 February)

Tim Panton via GitHub

• [webrtc-rtptransport] What is the scope of the circuit breaker ? (#92) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] Are HighResTimeStamps allowed? (#91) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• [webrtc-rtptransport] MTU is path dependent (#90) (Tuesday, 10 February)

Tove Petersson via GitHub

• Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Add algorithm for browser automation. (#328) (Thursday, 12 February)

youennf via GitHub

• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Revert the renaming of SFrameTransformOptions to RTCSFrameTransformOptions (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: [webrtc-encoded-transform] Web IDL hiccup: `SFrameTransformOptions` still used in constructors (#296) (Monday, 9 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] new commits pushed by youennf (Thursday, 5 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Add sframe script transform support (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Make sure to get the error link event correct and update the key name (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Pull Request: Add per packet sframe option (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [webrtc-encoded-transform] Expose an API to turn on per-packet sframe native support (#292) (Wednesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Friday, 13 February 2026 13:50:23 UTC