- From: youennf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 17:05:53 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
> Ah, I missed that. But `frame.[[rtcObject]]` appears undefined. Should it be `frame.[[owner]]`? Right, I should fix that. > I worry this is too clever and defeats encapsulation, composition, and early error detection. E.g. are you saying the following would work as long as `foo` is undefined? That should work too given how insertable stream pipeline and data is bound to an owner. I would like to get a full proposal here for SFrameTransform, RTCRtpScriptTransform, RTCRtpSender.transform and RTCRtpReceiver.transform. I would first judge on consistency inside the spec, then consistency with other specs. Funnily, we seem to lean towards removing stream from the title of the spec. -- GitHub Notification of comment by youennf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-insertable-streams/issues/65#issuecomment-792906265 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 8 March 2021 17:05:55 UTC