- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 00:49:54 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
jan-ivar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc: == transceiver.stop() shouldn't block in-progress replaceTrack from succeeding == Most WebRTC methods' final queued task say: 1. *If connection's [[IsClosed]] slot is true, then abort these steps.* But [sender.replaceTrack](http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#dom-rtcrtpsender-replacetrack)'s says: 1. *If transceiver's [[Stopped]] slot is true, abort these steps.* That may seem like the sender-scoped equivalent, but has the side-effect that `transceiver.stop()` causes an already in-progress `replaceTrack` to never resolve. That seems unintended. I propose we make them like the other. One question then is should the promise resolve or reject with an error? I think resolving is fine, since it's a glorified setter at that point; no harm will come of it. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2106 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2019 00:49:55 UTC