W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > December 2018

Re: [webrtc-pc] More simulcast examples (#2035)

From: Florent Castelli via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:25:40 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-444484032-1544016339-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@amithilbuch Implementation for those parameters is on-going.

The WebRTC API does map to features specified by the IETF RTCWEB but it isn't meant to have full coverage of features, but answer some use-cases. It is fine to only be able to generate a subset of the possible values. We should be able to accept all values from a remote implementing the full protocol though.

@aboba I don't believe that `maxFramerate` or `maxBitrate` would be filled by `max-fs` or `max-br`. I believe they should be enforced at the lower level as hard limits. An application could chose to raise the `maxBitrate` value above `max-br` but the later should be honored (real limit would be the minimum between the two values).
It would be similar to `max-height` or `max-width` from SDP which won't map to any `RTCEncodingParameters` entry but should probably still be honored by the sender.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Orphis
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2035#issuecomment-444484032 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2018 13:25:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 9 October 2019 15:15:00 UTC