- From: Bernard Aboba via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 22:45:33 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
@jan-ivar That is correct, but there may be some other archeological remains to be sorted out. Do you recall why `RTCIceCandidate` was defined as an interface instead of a dictionary (as it is in ORTC)? I seem to recall that the union arose from the desire to enable existing implementations to continue to work while moving toward `RTCIceCandidate` as the argument to ICE-related methods. But if `RTCIceCandidate` had been a dictionary, would this have been needed?? I would note that extension specifications such as WebRTC-ICE utilize `RTCIceCandidate` as an argument to added methods (see: https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-ice/), so I'd like to figure out whether this change has implications for other specification as well. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aboba Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1954#issuecomment-410876425 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 August 2018 22:45:45 UTC