W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [webrtc-pc] Ambiguities with BUNDLE and ICE

From: Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:01:44 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-333597211-1506963690-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The reason I think it doesn't belong in ICE is that, with just ICE and not BUNDLE, you can use the SDP m= section's index as the identifier. The third m= section in one offer describes the same ICE session in the third m= section of a subsequent offer (unless it was recycled somewhere in the middle). That's why I'd suggest putting this in the "ICE considerations" section of BUNDLE. But I don't feel strongly about this at all; it's just what seemed most "correct".

GitHub Notification of comment by taylor-b
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1563#issuecomment-333597211 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 2 October 2017 17:01:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:21:47 UTC