W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [webrtc-pc] Ambiguities with BUNDLE and ICE

From: Harald Alvestrand via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 08:47:35 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-333475406-1506934041-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Using addresses as identifiers in SDP became stupid the day ICE was introduced.
If that works for all cases, I'd support using the UFRAG as the identifier of the transport, and saying "if ICE is in use, UFRAG is the thing that identifies the transport".
That's a statement that belongs in ICE, though. Is anyone saying such a thing there?

GitHub Notification of comment by alvestrand
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1563#issuecomment-333475406 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 2 October 2017 08:47:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:21:47 UTC