Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics)

@taylor-b In cases of accidental collisions, highly unexpected and undesirable I think. Were it done on purpose, I wouldn't expect implementations to pull off synchronization anyway, even if things came from the same place, like in my fiddle experiment. There are only bad choices here. I mean, this is why we moved to `transceiver.mid`, isn't it?

I think my preference would be to note this pitfall in the spec, and mark `stream.id` as legacy. Then, as to what should happen, probably what already happens. I'll test how Chrome handles it.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1128#issuecomment-300801880 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 14:12:57 UTC