W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?

From: stefan hakansson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 11:27:54 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-300761570-1494502073-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Can we close this Issue as the discussion seem to conclude we should not describe addStream/onaddstream?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by stefhak
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1125#issuecomment-300761570 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 11 May 2017 11:28:01 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Varun Singh via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-stats] adding total consent interval"
Previous message: Philipp Hancke via GitHub: "Closed: [webrtc-pc] what is the component for a icetransport of a datachannel?"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: youennf via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: youennf via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"
Maybe reply: Philipp Hancke via GitHub: "Re: [webrtc-pc] Should the spec describe addStream/onaddstream as legacy API?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:40 UTC