Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics

@jan-ivar Yes, that sounds right.

> If signaling track ids is such legacy should it be removed?

It seems too late to change, but we could ask rtcweb.

> I don't understand why the spec suggests creating receivers for locally sourced tracks.

It's not intuitive. But when you add a track, you also automatically offer to receive a track, since you offer a sendrecv m= section. It may or may not end up receiving something, depending on what the answerer does.

GitHub Notification of comment by taylor-b
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:40:53 UTC