W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > April 2017

Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics

From: Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:40:47 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-294923381-1492537245-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@jan-ivar Yes, that sounds right.

> If signaling track ids is such legacy should it be removed?

It seems too late to change, but we could ask rtcweb.

> I don't understand why the spec suggests creating receivers for locally sourced tracks.

It's not intuitive. But when you add a track, you also automatically offer to receive a track, since you offer a sendrecv m= section. It may or may not end up receiving something, depending on what the answerer does.

GitHub Notification of comment by taylor-b
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1128#issuecomment-294923381 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 17:40:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:40 UTC