W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > April 2017

Re: [webrtc-pc] example 13: getReceivers semantics

From: Philipp Hancke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 05:09:30 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-294680880-1492492169-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> I agree it doesn't make sense. But signaling track IDs is redundant in the first place, now that we have MIDs. So, from my perspective, this is just legacy baggage we have to deal with, and it doesn't really matter what we do as long as the behavior is predictable.

If signaling track ids is such legacy should it be removed? As Byron pointed out, replaceTrack is another example of where things become inconsistent.

GitHub Notification of comment by fippo
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1128#issuecomment-294680880 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 05:09:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:40 UTC