Re: Should we try to get another VI done before end of year?

This Thursday is a holiday for me (and most of the US).  I had assumed no
meeting this week.

-- dan


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> At this point, it looks like we have at least half a dozen pull requests
> arising from the Virtual Interim.  So we have a decent chance of getting
> some of those PRs merged by December 12.
>
> The bigger question is what Issues (and hopefully, suggested solutions!)
> we would put on the agenda.   We could go over this in our next editor's
> meeting (are we meeting on Thursday of this week?).
>
> We could, for example, put on the agenda issues that arose at IETF 97.
> For example, there was discussion of changes to setLocalDescription, raised
> in https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/950.
>
> There are also ICE issues that we could discuss, both leftovers from the
> last VI  (e.g. final review for OAuth and ufrag changes) and perhaps a few
> new ones (such as auto discovery of STUN/TURN).
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Daniel Burnett [danielcburnett@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 7:31 AM
> To: Stefan Håkansson LK
> Cc: public-webrtc-editors@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Should we try to get another VI done before end of year?
>
> Two challenges here:
> 1) I still haven't heard back from Cullen on webrtc-pc, so the specs are
> frozen.  Although I guess the reason for the 24 hours was so that we didn't
> have to wait more than that, and besides, Cullen has clearly reviewed the
> webrtc-pc spec right before I updated the change log.  So maybe I can just
> push both today.
>
> 2) It may be tough to get most of the last VI changes into the document by
> the week preceding December 12.
>
> However, I think it's worth doing a Doodle poll to reserve a date just in
> case we are able to have everything ready.  If we are able to get enough
> into the docs and it looks like the people we would need would be available
> (based on the Doodle poll), then we can go ahead and do it.
>
> -- dan
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK <
> stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com<mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>>
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the last VI was pretty successful IMO. I'm wondering if we should have
> another one before the end of the year? The only week I see could
> working is the one of December 12-16.
>
> To me it seems for that to make sense we need two things:
>
> - Get a draft out with (most of) what was agreed at last VI incorporated
>
> - Have open Issues that would benefit from on-line discussion (and I
> think we have)
>
> Do you guys it would make sense, or should we push to next year?
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>