Re: Merging PR #616

I don't know why this was delivered a long time after being sent.

I think Adam's proposal is better.

On 10/05/16 09:31, "Stefan Håkansson LK"
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

>I think we should get it in asap, so I think your proposal is good.
>
>Stefan
>
>On 10/05/16 08:55, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> This is a big one.
>>
>> And it's pretty sure to invalidate every other PR in the queue (and vice
>> versa).
>>
>> Should we merge this ASAP, and spend the time up to Thursday's call on
>> rebasing the others?
>>
>> I think it's pretty important that we get this one in, and *currently*
>> it merges without conflict.
>>
>> Harald
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 22:50:55 UTC