I don't know why this was delivered a long time after being sent. I think Adam's proposal is better. On 10/05/16 09:31, "Stefan Håkansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: >I think we should get it in asap, so I think your proposal is good. > >Stefan > >On 10/05/16 08:55, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> This is a big one. >> >> And it's pretty sure to invalidate every other PR in the queue (and vice >> versa). >> >> Should we merge this ASAP, and spend the time up to Thursday's call on >> rebasing the others? >> >> I think it's pretty important that we get this one in, and *currently* >> it merges without conflict. >> >> Harald >> >> >> > >Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 22:50:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:19:04 UTC