Re: Merging PR #616

I think we should get it in asap, so I think your proposal is good.

Stefan

On 10/05/16 08:55, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> This is a big one.
>
> And it's pretty sure to invalidate every other PR in the queue (and vice
> versa).
>
> Should we merge this ASAP, and spend the time up to Thursday's call on
> rebasing the others?
>
> I think it's pretty important that we get this one in, and *currently*
> it merges without conflict.
>
> Harald
>
>
>


Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 07:49:49 UTC