- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 08:29:48 +0000
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>, "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
I agree to what you're saying Bernard. Though the point I tried to make was slightly different: AFAIK we are not describing anywhere what the MediaTrackSettings would read for a track sourced by a PeerConnection. Someone reading the WebRTC spec would just be directed to the mediacapture-main one, and there MediaTrackSettings are defined to include things like facingMode and so on. I think we should add something in section 10.3 MediaStreamTrack. On 23/02/16 22:05, Bernard Aboba wrote: > While characteristics such as width, height, framerate may be > conveyed by the negotiated video codec, these are not track > properties, but rather properties of the encoded video. > > Also, it is not necessarily the case that either track or encoder > properties will be symmetric. For example, a mobile device might be > able to capture or encode at higher framerate and resolution than it > is capable of decoding or rendering. > > So my take is that if the developer desires to transmit various track > properties to the remote peer, this would be best done by explicitly > sending them over the data channel. > > -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Håkansson LK > [mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, > 2016 5:25 AM To: webrtc-editors@alvestrand.no Subject: What track > settings are carried over a peer connection? > > Hi, > > I'm working on the PR that says the "characteristics such as width, > height, framerate and so on" should be carried over a PeerConn (i.e. > that the remote track should have similar characteristics as the one > being sent). This can be expressed in terms of MediaTrackSettings, > but it made me wonder: > > Have we documented somewhere what the MediaTrackSettings should read > out for a track sourced by a PeerConnection. > > Things like width, height, framerate seems straightforward, but what > about things like facingMode, echoCancellation, latency? That should > (is?) be documented somewhere. > > Stefan > >
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2016 05:51:43 UTC