- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 23:01:28 +0200
- To: "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
Overarching issues: Work style - does the current style work for us? In what roles would more manpower help get things resolved faster? Mediacapture-main: Pull requests: ------------- #170 Errors - not ready yet? #171 HTML 5.1 reference for srcObject - ready? #172 Use [Exposed] - ready? Travis is still failing because of the link problem on these - not rerun recently? Issues: ------- #118 Practical algorithm - HTA was to push this to list. #127 Timeout - still sleeping #157 rename enumerateDevices - close due to LC disposition? #161 Remove Direct Assignment - see #171 #162 MediaStreamError - working on it, see #170 #163 Use [Exposed] - see #172 #173 Consider specifying a minimum length for deviceId - NEW LC issues: ---------- Stuff that needs editing in rather than more discussion: - LC-3022 Latency constraint - Peter's promised a PR - LC-3027 Internationalization of "message" - needs some words - LC-3019 IDL errors - we *can* patch this to make IDL checkers happy (more dummy types). Should we? Webrtc-PC: Pull requests: #29 mediadiscarded - time to find another Martin? #195 replaceTrack - the first cut didn't cut it, but list discussion seems to suggest that we now know approx. what we want. #215 Expiring certificates - merge? #221 Define when RTCRtpReceivers are created and dispatched - Adam? #222 Replace operations array with a chain - does anyone care? #225 Support for pending and current SDP - still discussion with Jan-Ivar in JSEP #228 QoS API (priority) - debated hotly on list. Waiting for Martin/Peter to spec alternative (RTPSender.EncodingParameters, with a get/set model for changing). #229 Removing optionality from constructors - good? Some selected bugs: #129 Encoding Parameters -see discussion on #228 #140 DataChannel.onerror() needs an error parameter specified (another Error! Yay!) #151 close is synchronous and idempotent #179 IP address revelation - where do we think we are?
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2015 21:01:58 UTC