Re: Agenda, June 25 2015

On 6/24/15 11:01 AM, Dan Burnett wrote:
>
> On Jun 24, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
>> First off: I won't be there.
>> Turns out I'm sitting on a plane while you're talking. Stuff happens. Sorry.
>>
>> Highest priority for the week: Getting out a new getusermedia draft, so
>> that Dom can send out the Last Call responses we have prepared (the ones
>> that are ready, that is).
>
> We might want to consider just pushing, then.  Although there has been consistent progress on the error handling, each step introduces changes that require review on the list.  I'd rather we not push any of the error handling changes than only be able to push a halfway state.  I think we can be completely done in another week (assuming no objections), but that's yet another week.

Agreed.

>> Media capture and streams
>> -------------------------------------
>> Pull requests:
>> - #171 referring to HTML 5.1 - suggest this is Good Enough now.

+1

>> - #181 Remove text about firing event handles - Adam, is it important
>> enough that we should do this after #194 is done, but before the new
>> editors' draft?
>> - #194 Overconstrainederror - suggest we merge. Only Domenic is capable
>> of reviewing this at the moment (just about).

See Dan's comments above.

>> Issues:
>> - #118 Practical algorithm - Cullen reopened it. I asked him to take it
>> to the list. No action yet.
>> - #127 lack of timeout - still icebox
>> - #161 Remove direct assigment - see PR #171
>> - #162 MediaStreamError - see PR #194
>> - # 176 constrainable pattern shold pass an IDL validator - Adam?
>> - #189 getUserMedia({}) should be a TypeError
>> - #191 Support zoom - No
>> - #192 Support setting focus - No
>> - #193 Adaptive frame rate
>> - #196 Spec not tamper proof
>> - #197 Channel count - NOTE: IPR issue, specific proposal from
>> non-WG-member. Suggest ask proposer to join (simplest).
>> - #198 Capabilities discovery via EnumerateDevices() - as above.
>>
>> Webrtc-PC
>> --------------
>> Pull requests: 11
>>
>> Many of these have the problem of proposer not responding.

I haven't reviewed all of these in depth but will do so tomorrow or Friday.

>> - #29 mediadiscarded

I've reviewed this one and will ping the proposer.

>> - #229 Removing optionality
>> - #235 Modernize getStats - I think this is OK
>> - #236 Replace operations array with chain - Adam?
>> - #237 ReplaceTrack with open issue
>> - #238 Use HTTPS - think we should merge this, or close and do
>> search/replace (no response to whitespace complaint)

I prefer the second option and can take care of that.

>> - #239 tidy target - Adam/Dan, is this useful?
>> - #240 Move certificate management section - sure, why not?
>> - #241 Lots of goodies (DTLStransport, ICEtransport)
>> - #242 Remove syntax error - dom is most often right
>> - #243 Mark candidate property required - overlap with #229?
>>
>> Bugs: 32
>>
>> We really need to define the icebox for non-1.0 items.... if we have
>> time, should we instead discuss how to get 1.0 and "the next version" split?
>>
>> (Since I won't be there, leaving decision to my co-chairs)

Thanks, Harald!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 03:15:55 UTC