- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:13:02 +0000
- To: "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
Present: Dan, Erik, Peter & Stefan On 29/07/15 14:16, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote: > General stuff: > > - Anything to report from the (planned) physical Editor's meeting in the > Prague hallways last week? Dan, Harald and Peter T met. Cullen had noted that stuff he had done for Priority was missing (enumerated settings). To be corrected in an updated PR (#259). Peter's list of PRs was gone through and discussed, but none was merged. Another topic: TR templates update survey - Dan to take a look. > > > getUserMedia > ============ > Peter has reviewed - any immediate feedback? A couple of questions about the privacy and security stuff. And some things in the capabilities section (11.3 has some things about video width/height and capabilities that seem unclear). Text about capabilities and constraints is very complex and hard to understand, but that's mostly due to the complexity of the problem. > > PRs > --- > #207 specify order of events: merge? Merged. > #208 pass IDL validator: merge? Merged. > #209 support implemented constraints: awaiting Adam > #210 channelCount: need someone (more than me) to review Discussion still ongoing. > #211 enumerateDevices -> capabilities: would like to assign to an editor > for review Discussion still ongoing. Dan to review it for sanity on the part of using capabilities this way for output devices. > #214 new error event: Dan, status? Peter to check, and merge if things look OK. > #215 overconstrained error: merge? Should be merged ASAP. Travis issues. Peter to look into, and merge if OK. > #216 legacy error: caught in external dependecies? Dan need to look into the comments. Peter will review. > #217 remove DOMExceptions from table: follow Anne's advice? Peter to review and merge if sound, and add a note about that we know there is still a ref to mediastreamerror, see pr 216. > #219 persist Id only after gUM grant: looks fine to me Assigned to Peter. > #220 markup fixes: looks good? Peter to merge. > > Issues > ------ > Most seem tied to a PR, perhaps we should discuss > #203 Text on 'overconstrained' Dan to review again and apply if nothing has changed. > #204 same object - we should just draft a PR > #212 Privacy/security review questions Chairs to discuss how to address this request. > > WebRTC 1.0 > ========== > Let's go through the open PRs #241 - discussion on the list, removing "chairs decision needed label". > >
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2015 15:13:29 UTC