Re: The Error bug - #162 - new editors' draft needed, or what?

On 08/19/2015 01:26 PM, Dan Burnett wrote:
> I suspect the former, since we have *completely* rewritten the Error parts of the spec.  We can either ask directly now or push the editor's draft and then ask him to verify.  I suggest we push and then ask.

We need to push anyway. Suggest we aim to push after tomorrow's call.

(hmm.... agenda time!)

>
>
> -- dan
>
>> On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>
>> Ref annevk's comment "I don't see how this was addressed"....
>>
>> Is the problem that he doesn't see the fix in the editors' draft (which
>> means we need to release one), or that he doesn't see how the
>> redefinition addresses the issue he raised?
>>
>> Harald
>>
>>

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 11:34:38 UTC