Re: The Error bug - #162 - new editors' draft needed, or what?

I suspect the former, since we have *completely* rewritten the Error parts of the spec.  We can either ask directly now or push the editor's draft and then ask him to verify.  I suggest we push and then ask.


-- dan

> On Aug 19, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> 
> Ref annevk's comment "I don't see how this was addressed"....
> 
> Is the problem that he doesn't see the fix in the editors' draft (which
> means we need to release one), or that he doesn't see how the
> redefinition addresses the issue he raised?
> 
> Harald
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 11:26:48 UTC